Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/14/2012 07:36 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

In discussing the new Java Guidelines, we've run into the question of
whether arch-sepcific but non-multilib packages need to use %{_libdir} for
files or if they can be placed in %{_prefix}/lib/ on all arches.
...
could also be affected by this question.  (as noted by rdieter here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/158#comment:3
...
So what are thoughts on allowing both 32bit and 64bit binaries into
%{_prefix}/lib if those binaries are not part of a package that will be
%multilib'd?

Personally, the more i think about it, the more it feels right and makes
sense to allow this.  In essence, one can consider non-multilib'd
%_prefix/lib and %_libexecdir content to be equal policy-wise.

I do not agree. %_libexecdir is policy-wise similar to %_bindir (non multilib'ed).

Ralf


--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux