Hi all, Am 15.10.2012 23:43, schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:18:02 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> Given the speed at which this package changes, we're not talking about >>> weeks or months, but possibly just days that there would be a conflict >>> due to a rushed out python-datanommer-models package. Why can't the new >>> python-datanommer-models not be released _together_ with a corresponding >>> datanommer package? >>> >> I think that we're anticipating that the packager is going to do different >> things. When I read the quote, I'm imagining that he is going to be >> releasing the new datanommer package together with the new >> python-datanommer-models package. Which would mean the packagest available >> in the yum updates repository shouldn't have any conflicts between the two >> packages (because the Conflicts is versioned). > > Well, it would be _so_ easy to not release the datanommer package until > the needed python-datanommer-models package will be available: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/datanommer > > Introducing a confusing Conflicts tag (even a versioned one) can be > avoided in this case, too. It would be weird to push datanommer to stable, > if things will move/change/be replaced afterwards anyway. > Thanks for all your ideas and suggestions. Hopefully the packager (Ralph Bean) has tracked this thread. In any case I will give him a hint. Best Regards, Mario -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
