Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Given the speed at which this package changes, we're not talking about
> weeks or months, but possibly just days that there would be a conflict
> due to a rushed out python-datanommer-models package. Why can't the new
> python-datanommer-models not be released _together_ with a corresponding
> datanommer package?
>
I think that we're anticipating that the packager is going to do different
things.  When I read the quote, I'm imagining that he is going to be
releasing the new datanommer package together with the new
python-datanommer-models package.  Which would mean the packagest available
in the yum updates repository shouldn't have any conflicts between the two
packages (because the Conflicts is versioned).

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpIj5qsIM6VL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux