Tom Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On 04/13/2012 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Well, if it has to be in a new subpackage then I'm just going to drop it. > > The entire rationale for the stub was to make things "just work" for > > people who don't read the release notes. If it requires they install > > a new subpackage they never heard of before, that would still require > > reading the release notes, so it's not helpful. (Unless I was to make > > postgresql-server require the new subpackage, but I'm sure that would > > not be considered good packaging practice either ...) > > I understand what you're saying here. I think dropping the stub is the > best path forward here, along with making sure that the new "helper" > commands are in the release notes. My concern would be that we should likely standardize on a format/invocation for new helper commands wherever possible. Do we have existing ones outside of iptables at this point? Bill -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
