On 04/13/2012 11:33 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Tom Callaway (tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx) said: >> On 04/13/2012 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Well, if it has to be in a new subpackage then I'm just going to drop it. >>> The entire rationale for the stub was to make things "just work" for >>> people who don't read the release notes. If it requires they install >>> a new subpackage they never heard of before, that would still require >>> reading the release notes, so it's not helpful. (Unless I was to make >>> postgresql-server require the new subpackage, but I'm sure that would >>> not be considered good packaging practice either ...) >> >> I understand what you're saying here. I think dropping the stub is the >> best path forward here, along with making sure that the new "helper" >> commands are in the release notes. > > My concern would be that we should likely standardize on a format/invocation > for new helper commands wherever possible. Do we have existing ones outside > of iptables at this point? We attempted to do this at the same time, but we couldn't come up with anything sane or obvious. If you can, we'd welcome it. ~tom == Fedora Project -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
