On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Russell Golden <niveusluna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > mozilla-adblockplus won't build in EL6. I suspect the version of > python-jinja2 is too old. Yepp, you already posted the failure here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799087 I'd file a bug against it and see if it can be updated. While searching for the latest update, I hit this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=757895 python-jinja2-26 is a really strange package name and installs strange too, but BR that and mozilla-adblockplus builds fine in mock here. (But you need to adjust PYTHONPATH a bit: PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Jinja2-2.6-py2.6.egg python build.py build [snip]) The whole package looks strange/odd to me, so not judging about the strangeness above ;) Another thing: In the sources file is only the latest source, not all package versions you ever needed. > My question: The upstream XPI for mozilla-adblockplus includes a JAR > file. This JAR file contains _no_ libraries or binaries. It only has > images, javascript, and some XUL files. Definitely no Java, despite > the JAR extension. Do you mean mochitest/tests/performance/data/testpages.jar? > It appears to me that there are three options. > > Option 1: Unpack the upstream XPI and ship that. > Option 2: Figure out how to make this package build, if it can at all. > Option 3: Retire the package. AdBlock Plus 1.x will be disabled by > default in Firefox 10 without disabling addon compat checking, and I'm > not even sure it will work at all. I'm in favour of option 2 :) Hope that helps (didn't do any other checks, if it works etc as I don't have an epel6 installation). When jinja2 is needed on runtime, there is more todo than the PYTHONPATH hack above, but it doesn't look like. Greetings, Tom -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
