On 05/24/2012 11:13 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 10:18 +0200, Brendan Jones wrote:
To cater for existing RPMFusion users, I can be clear in the changelog /
update notes that this Fedora package is replacing the one in qtractor
and they should install qtractor-freeworld if MP3 support is desired.
Sound OK?
I don't have a strong opinion either way, but if I was implementing it,
I'd follow the following steps:
1. Push qtractor-freeworld into RPM Fusion and have it obsolete
qtractor
2. Finish getting qtractor reviewed in Fedora
3. A week or two after (1) happens (and *before* qtractor gets
pushed to testing in Fedora), remove the obsoletes from
qtractor-freeworld
4. Build qtractor in Fedora
The advantage of this process is that most RPM Fusion qtractor users get
qtractor-freeworld automatically (and the longer the obsoletes is left
in, the more RPM Fusion users get qtractor-freeworld).
Sure - however we should still implement alternatives in the
qtractor-freeworld package right?
(btw review is approved in Fedora already - although I've pulled the
update for the moment)
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
