Re: Is this a bug or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 10:53 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> 
> It may be worth a shot to contact libffi upstream about that unless
> it's just the Fedora package that uses %_libdir for the headers. 

I just peeked into the spec[1]. Looks like this is how upstream places
the header. 

Simone has already commented[2], requesting maintainer to move the
header to %{_includedir} and update the pc file. 


[1]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libffi.git/tree/libffi.spec?h=f18&id=d65ba2902243db21cce014b1a4bf383cc3f4d364

[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727301#c6

-- 
Thanks, 
Warm regards,
Ankur: "FranciscoD"

Please only print if necessary. 

Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux