Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/28/2012 10:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:


All three versions provide the same output, unless I did some mistake,
since I did not tested it (actually the middle one was taken directly
from rubygem-POpen4.spec). So which version you prefer? Please note that
the "gem install" will always "unpack" the gem with some additional, for
our case unimportant, steps. We do not distribute the .gem file anywhere.

You didn't exactly (directly) answer my question. Pretend I don't know much about ruby... (not far from the truth).

So, for rubygem packages that include native (C or otherwise code), how and when is this compiled? If it is always done so during either version of these guidelines, please do accept my apologies for being ignorant.

However, you do say you do not distribute the .gem, though I'm curious why this seem to contradict you:

rpm -qlp rubygem-POpen4-0.1.4-3.fc17.noarch.rpm
/usr/share/gems/cache/POpen4-0.1.4.gem
...

-- rex
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux