On Wed, 16 May 2012 07:20:56 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Tomas Radej wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible for man pages to use the %doc macro in the %files section in a spec file? In Guidelines, there's no explicit mention of it, and I haven't found a package having this behavior. However, I am reviewing spacewalk-pylint ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800899 ), which does this: > > > > %files > > %doc %{_mandir}/man8/spacewalk-pylint.8* > > > > Can you please give me a stance on that? > > It seems more logical to list the man page in the regular %files > section, and leave doc for things like html, COPYING, README, etc. > Though I've never tried the above, I'm not sure whether it would put > the man page in /usr/share/doc/foo-version/, breaking man's ability to > find it, or put it in the man dir, and allow it to be left out if > --nodocs is passed. The %doc macro does two different things depending on whether you use it in conjunction with a _local_ file or an absolute path to a file. For the former, it installs a copy of that file in the default docdir as you've mentioned and marks it as Documentation. For the latter, it just marks the already installed file as Documentation. -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.01 0.05 0.05 -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
