On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:36:26 -0500 (EST), Ray Strode wrote: > > Has this been introduced recently, or has it been like that always? > > > > Looking through the history, it's been that way as long as there was a libs subpackage. > I didn't do a very good job documenting adding the subpackage in the commit message either. > I just snuck it into a "upgrade to latest release" message: > > Date: Tue Oct 18 22:47:14 2011 -0400 Okay, that explains it. I've filed a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/889674 It would be EasyFix, but there is an explicit dep in "gnome-shell" on "gdm-libs" (for the gi file) already, and it's not clear to me yet whether gnome-shell also wants files from "gdm" (via the indirect dep currently). That makes the -libs subpackage questionable. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
