Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 07:28:41AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 11:28 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >Fedora's policy is to not depend on LLVM/Clang as much as possible, but
> >would it be acceptable to use LLVM/Clang to compile newer LLVM and Clang
> >releases?
> 
> I think it's reasonable to allow llvm to bootstrap itself.
> 
Does anyone know if there's any security features that gcc compiles in that
would be important for clang/llvm?  Are there things other than clang/llvm
that are using llvm?  (python had attempted to but then abandoned the idea).

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpNdciPI_Uct.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux