On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:20:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Was about to comment on a review that > BuildRequires: glibc-devel > isn't needed and was in the list of exceptions, and was to link the list > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > only to discover it indeed is not there. > > Shouldn't it be? > > A Similar argument could probably be made for libstdc++-devel It hasn't come up often enough over the past years. The guidelines say: | There is no need to include the following packages | or their dependencies ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (!) * gcc and gcc-c++ are on the list * gcc requires glibc-devel * gcc-c++ requires libstdc++-devel -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.5.3-1.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.20 0.29 0.29 -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
