Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:20:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Was about to comment on a review that >> BuildRequires: glibc-devel >> isn't needed and was in the list of exceptions, and was to link the list >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 >> only to discover it indeed is not there. >> >> Shouldn't it be? >> >> A Similar argument could probably be made for libstdc++-devel > > It hasn't come up often enough over the past years. The guidelines say: > > | There is no need to include the following packages > | or their dependencies ... > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Oh thanks! -- rex -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
