Quoting Lin Gao (2012-05-25 10:07:08) > Hi, > > We have a package already built in Fedora called: ironjacamar, > which only produces several core jars used by JBoss AS 7. We also want > to built a ironjacamar standalone environment which can make the > ironjacamar running without JBoss AS 7 environment, but this standalone > environment has different libraries than JBoss AS 7 has. So we plan to > built a overall new package called: ironjacamar-standalone, which > produces the ironjacamar standalone environment, it will use the same > source as the package: ironjacamar uses. I want to know if it is > approved in Fedora? Have you contacted ironjacamar maintainer? I assume ironjacamar produces only some of the jars required by JBoss AS7, because building additional jars would need more dependencies. In order to simplify packaging: these were skipped. I don't know the details, but I believe going for a subpackage approach would be better. Getting in touch with ironjacamar maintainers is needed in any case. Or maybe I misunderstood and you say ironjacamar-standalone is meant to be used without requiring several jboss packages? Even in that case a subpackages could be done in a way to have simple dependencies for one subpackage and main package just having subpackage in Requires. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
