On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > On 04/28/2012 04:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >What does the Packaging Committee think about the following? > > > >[...] > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/759823 is the review request for libkdtree++ > > > >That is a C++ template container implementation, which does not build a > >shared library file to link with, but ships only C++ templates in header > >files. > > > >The resulting -devel package needs to be handled in the same way than > >a -static library package. Whenever there are important fixes in the > >templates, dependencies may need to be rebuilt. Not limited to security > >vulnerabilities. Any bug-fixes in the template implementation would only > >propagate to applications when rebuilding the application packages. > > +1, sounds similar to eigen2-devel and eigen3-devel > +1 as well. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpyDyG3aaJWP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
