On 10/26/2012 11:29 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:25:01PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 25/10/2012 19:07, Toshio Kuratomi ha scritto: >>>>> Fedora's policy is to not depend on LLVM/Clang as much as >>>>> possible, but >>>>>>> would it be acceptable to use LLVM/Clang to compile >>>>>>> newer LLVM and Clang releases? >>>>> >>>>> I think it's reasonable to allow llvm to bootstrap itself. >>>>> >>> Does anyone know if there's any security features that gcc >>> compiles in that would be important for clang/llvm? Are there >>> things other than clang/llvm that are using llvm? (python had >>> attempted to but then abandoned the idea). >> >> Software rendering in Mesa (used by recent GNOME3 instead of >> fallback mode). >> > Thanks. For me, this would be a point in favor of compiling LLVM > with gcc. > Yes, that seems to be the safe choice. Thanks! -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | GPG key ID: A36A937A Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging