Fedora Packaging
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-05-15 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
- Re: Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
- Re: Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
- Building a non functional package just to remove dependency mess
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-05-08 18:00 - HH:MM UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-05-08 16:00 UTC)
- Re: one less binary package
- Re: one less binary package
- Re: one less binary package
- Re: one less binary package
- one less binary package
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-05-01 16:00 - 17:50 UTC)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-05-01 16:00 - 17:50 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-05-01 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Question: will bundling of xml and pckl be allowed in this case?
- Re: Question: will bundling of xml and pckl be allowed in this case?
- Question: will bundling of xml and pckl be allowed in this case?
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-24 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Another way to handle icon cache?
- Re: Another way to handle icon cache?
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-04-17 16:00 - 17:15 UTC)
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-04-17 16:00 - 17:15 UTC)
- Re: Another way to handle icon cache?
- Another way to handle icon cache?
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-17 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-17 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-17 16:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-17 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Review swap: BZ#1080583
- Re: Review swap: BZ#1080583
- Review swap: BZ#1080583
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-10 16:00 UTC)
- Re: environment module alternatives
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-10 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-10 16:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-10 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-04-03 16:00 - 18:15 UTC)
- environment module alternatives
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-04-03 16:00 - 18:15 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-03 16:00 UTC) (post DST change UTC time)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-04-03 16:00 UTC) (post DST change UTC time)
- FPC meeting time
- Re: repmgr
- Re: No responce to new ticket #407
- Re: repmgr
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-03-27 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Re: repmgr
- Re: repmgr
- Selective updates of sub-packages
- Re: repmgr
- repmgr
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-03-27 17:00 UTC) (next week back to 16:00 UTC)
- Re: No responce to new ticket #407
- Re: No responce to new ticket #407
- Re: No responce to new ticket #407
- Re: No responce to new ticket #407
- No responce to new ticket #407
- Re: python module not installed
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-03-20 17:00 UTC) (US still on DST)
- Re: Fwd: Broken dependencies: mup
- Fwd: Broken dependencies: mup
- kernel debug-info build
- Re: python27-numpy scl build
- python27-numpy scl build
- Re: How to Remove a Subpackage
- Re: python module not installed
- Re: python module not installed
- Re: python module not installed
- Re: python module not installed
- Re: python module not installed
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-03-13 17:00 - 18:55 UTC)
- Re: python module not installed
- Re: python module not installed
- Re: packages which require the kernel package
- python module not installed
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-03-13 17:00 UTC) (one hour later for US)
- Should libgit2 request a temporary bundling exception for xdiff?
- Re: packages which require the kernel package
- packages which require the kernel package
- Re: How to Remove a Subpackage
- How to Remove a Subpackage
- [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-03-06 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-03-06 17:00 UTC)
- Re: [colord] Add conflict on icc-profiles-openicc
- Re: [colord] Add conflict on icc-profiles-openicc
- Re: [colord] Add conflict on icc-profiles-openicc
- Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites
- Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check
- From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Re: How to calculate priority for missing tests or %check
- Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites
- [colord] Add conflict on icc-profiles-openicc
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-02-27 17:00 - 18:50 UTC)
- Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites
- Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites
- Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites
- Re: Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites
- Wiki pages: Missing tests in %check and missing upstream test suites
- Re: Naming guidelines: outdated info about tilde in version
- Re: Naming guidelines: outdated info about tilde in version
- Re: Naming guidelines: outdated info about tilde in version
- Re: Packages with missing %check
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-02-27 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Packages with missing %check
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-02-27 17:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-02-27 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Packages with missing %check
- Re: Lightening Ekiga
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Lightening Ekiga
- Re: Packages with missing %check
- Re: Packages with missing %check
- Re: Packages with missing %check
- From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Packages with missing %check
- Re: Future of gridgengine package
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: Setting secure-file-priv in my.cnf
- Packaging:JavaScript correct macro?
- Re: Bodhi new package "Details" text
- Bodhi new package "Details" text
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Re: May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- May I file 1000 bugs aka upstream test suite tracking
- Future of gridgengine package
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-02-20 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-02-20 17:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-02-20 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Downstream .so versioning
- Re: udev rules update macro
- New Packaging Guidelines Proposal: Drupal 7
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-02-13 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-02-13 17:00 UTC)
- Bundled libraries in Icecat 24
- Re: udev rules update macro
- Re: udev rules update macro
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- udev rules update macro
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Re: Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- Guidelines update for "Packaging of Additional RPM Macros"
- Re: patches- macro
- Re: patches- macro
- Re: patches- macro
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- patches- macro
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-01-30 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Adding package to RPMFusion
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- FPC meeting 2014-01-30
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Build Environment Consistency
- Build Environment Consistency
- Re: Adding package to RPMFusion
- Re: Adding package to RPMFusion
- Re: Adding package to RPMFusion
- Adding package to RPMFusion
- Re: Vendor name?
- Re: Vendor name?
- Re: Vendor name?
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Vendor name?
- Packaging Software
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-01-23 17:00 - 18:50 UTC)
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: go guidelines draft submitted
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-01-23 17:00 UTC)
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: Web Assets and JavaScript Guidelines
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: who should own /etc/dconf directory
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: Packaging a web app that bundles a lot of stuff (OctoPrint)
- Autotools Obsolete macros
- who should own /etc/dconf directory
- Re: Packaging a web app that bundles a lot of stuff (OctoPrint)
- gstreamer packages naming?
- Re: Packaging a web app that bundles a lot of stuff (OctoPrint)
- Re: Web Assets and JavaScript Guidelines
- Re: Packaging a web app that bundles a lot of stuff (OctoPrint)
- Re: Unclear license
- Re: Unclear license
- Re: Unclear license
- Clarification for Packaging:JavaScript#CompilationMinification
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Web Assets and JavaScript Guidelines
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-01-16 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-01-16 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Unclear license
- Re: Unclear license
- Unclear license
- Outdated guideline about Requires(foo, bar) syntax
- go guidelines draft submitted
- Re: Switching to a fork
- Re: Switching to a fork
- Switching to a fork
- Re: package release tag issue snapshot pre-release or post-release
- package release tag issue snapshot pre-release or post-release
- Perl autorequires failing for git-svn
- Re: Use of %__isa_bits should be mandatory
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- python-sphinx generates different filenames in different architectures
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-01-09 17:00 - 18:35 UTC)
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2014-01-09 17:00 - 18:35 UTC)
- Re: A look at VR and R in subpackages
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2014-01-09 17:00 UTC)
- Re: A look at VR and R in subpackages
- Re: A look at VR and R in subpackages
- Re: Avoid an embedded font in a package
- Re: A look at VR and R in subpackages
- A look at VR and R in subpackages
- Re: Avoid an embedded font in a package
- Re: Avoid an embedded font in a package
- Avoid an embedded font in a package
- Re: Packaging a web app that bundles a lot of stuff (OctoPrint)
- Packaging a web app that bundles a lot of stuff (OctoPrint)
- Node.js guidelines update never merged
- Naming guidelines: outdated info about tilde in version
- Re: kickstart group list
- Re: kickstart group list
- kickstart group list
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-12-19 17:00 - 18:30 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-12-19 17:00 UTC)
- Re: problem with separate doc packages
- Re: problem with separate doc packages
- Re: problem with separate doc packages
- problem with separate doc packages
- Re: -javadoc and -doc packages with Requires
- Re: -javadoc and -doc packages with Requires
- Re: -javadoc and -doc packages with Requires
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- -javadoc and -doc packages with Requires
- Re: problem with fedora-review
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- problem with fedora-review
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-12-12 17:00 - 18:00 UTC)
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-12-12 17:00 - 18:00 UTC)
- Re: RPM conditional based on installed library?
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-12-12 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-12-12 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-12-12 17:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-12-12 17:00 UTC)
- Re: RPM conditional based on installed library?
- Re: RPM conditional based on installed library?
- RPM conditional based on installed library?
- Re: Ada guidelines changes for Comfignat and runpaths
- Re: Ada guidelines changes for Comfignat and runpaths
- Re: Ada guidelines changes for Comfignat and runpaths
- Re: Ada guidelines changes for Comfignat and runpaths
- Ada guidelines changes for Comfignat and runpaths
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-12-05 17:00 - 18:50 UTC)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-21 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-12-05 17:00 UTC)
- a question about rpmbuild command
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Proposal for Python guidelines change (in connection to Python 3 switch)
- Re: Zoneminder package in Fedora
- Re: Zoneminder package in Fedora
- Re: Packaging not the latest release
- Re: Packaging not the latest release
- Re: Packaging not the latest release
- Re: Packaging not the latest release
- Re: Packaging not the latest release
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Packaging not the latest release
- Re: Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?
- Re: Gconf schema files in packages
- Re: Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?
- Re: Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?
- Re: Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?
- Re: Gconf schema files in packages
- Re: Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?
- Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?
- Gconf schema files in packages
- Re: Zoneminder package in Fedora
- Re: Zoneminder package in Fedora
- Zoneminder package in Fedora
- Use of %__isa_bits should be mandatory
- Re: packaging one package with 2 frontends
- Re: packaging one package with 2 frontends
- packaging one package with 2 frontends
- Re: Upgrade path for Beta releases
- Re: Upgrade path for Beta releases
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Upgrade path for Beta releases
- Re: Upgrade path for Beta releases
- Upgrade path for Beta releases
- Re: cajun package review status?
- cajun package review status?
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-11-21 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-11-21 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-11-21 17:00 - 19:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-21 17:00 UTC)
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 - 19:10 UTC)
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
- Any RPM macro of /run?
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-07 16:00 - 17:35 UTC) (unofficial pre-meeting started at 15:20 UTC)
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-07 16:00 - 17:35 UTC) (unofficial pre-meeting started at 15:20 UTC)
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-07 16:00 - 17:35 UTC) (unofficial pre-meeting started at 15:20 UTC)
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-07 16:00 - 17:35 UTC) (unofficial pre-meeting started at 15:20 UTC)
- Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-07 16:00 - 17:35 UTC) (unofficial pre-meeting started at 15:20 UTC)
- Re: Missing packages in bugzilla
- Re: Missing library symbolic links
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: Missing library symbolic links
- SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-07 16:00 - 17:35 UTC) (unofficial pre-meeting started at 15:20 UTC)
- Re: Missing library symbolic links
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: Missing library symbolic links
- Re: Missing packages in bugzilla
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- update on FHS position on opt
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: SCL Easy questions: metapackage deps
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: Missing library symbolic links
- Re: Missing packages in bugzilla
- Missing library symbolic links
- Missing packages in bugzilla
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-07 16:00 UTC)
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting: Branches
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting: Branches
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- (from: Fedora Packaging ML) SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting: Branches
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting: Branches
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting: Branches
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, Filesystem location part 2
- SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff
- SCL Easy questions: metapackage deps
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-31 16:00 - 18:20 UTC)
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- Re: SCL in Fedora
- SCL in Fedora
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-31 16:00 UTC)
- Re: FPC meeting time
- Re: FPC meeting time
- Re: Review swaps
- Re: Review swaps
- Re: Review swaps
- Review swaps
- Re: FPC meeting time
- Re: Virtual provides of server(smtp)
- Re: Virtual provides of server(smtp)
- Re: FPC meeting time
- FPC meeting time
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Virtual provides of server(smtp)
- Re: Virtual provides of server(smtp)
- Re: Virtual provides of server(smtp)
- Virtual provides of server(smtp)
- How to properly install SWIG'ed mono-bindings?
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-24 16:00 - 18:00 UTC)
- Re: rpmlint: no warnings on overly long changelog entries
- Re: rpmlint: no warnings on overly long changelog entries
- Re: Package Android Studio in Fedora 21/20
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Package Android Studio in Fedora 21/20
- Re: rpmlint: no warnings on overly long changelog entries
- rpmlint: no warnings on overly long changelog entries
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-24 16:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-24 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Package Android Studio in Fedora 21/20
- Update to the Addon Packages naming guidelines for Python 3 Modules
- Package Android Studio in Fedora 21/20
- Re: packing a theme for fedora
- packing a theme for fedora
- Re: svn build issue
- Re: svn build issue
- svn build issue
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-17 16:00 UTC)
- Re: makeself-2.2.0-2.fc20 not tagged as an update candidate
- Re: makeself-2.2.0-2.fc20 not tagged as an update candidate
- Re: makeself-2.2.0-2.fc20 not tagged as an update candidate
- Re: makeself-2.2.0-2.fc20 not tagged as an update candidate
- Re: makeself-2.2.0-2.fc20 not tagged as an update candidate
- makeself-2.2.0-2.fc20 not tagged as an update candidate
- Re: Zoneminder packagers - Self Introduction for sponsership
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Zoneminder packagers - Self Introduction for sponsership
- ABRT Bugzilla bug format configuration files
- Needing help from sponsors to add me into packager group
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-10 16:00 UTC)
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- use case for scl-as-not-scl rebuilds [was: Re:SCL -- buildtime information]
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: SCL -- buildtime information
- SCL -- buildtime information
- Re: reaver-wps
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-10-03 16:00 - 17:30 UTC)
- reaver-wps
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-10-03 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: Is "Requires: X-debuginfo" allowed?
- Re: Is "Requires: X-debuginfo" allowed?
- Re: Is "Requires: X-debuginfo" allowed?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Is "Requires: X-debuginfo" allowed?
- Is "Requires: X-debuginfo" allowed?
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: dbh and/or DBH
- Re: dbh and/or DBH
- dbh and/or DBH
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-09-26 16:00 - 18:00 UTC)
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-26 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Moving configuration files in a package...
- Re: Moving configuration files in a package...
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-26 16:00 UTC)
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-26 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Moving configuration files in a package...
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-26 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-26 16:00 UTC)
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-26 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Moving configuration files in a package...
- Re: Moving configuration files in a package...
- Moving configuration files in a package...
- Re: How to check if someone is already working on a package/ Self Introduction
- Re: How to check if someone is already working on a package/ Self Introduction
- How to check if someone is already working on a package/ Self Introduction
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: lightdm
- Re: lightdm
- Re: lightdm-gtk
- lightdm-gtk
- lightdm
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: Naming policy for adding language translation packages
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- Re: up* httrack
- up* httrack
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Concurrency Kit naming
- Re: guidelines for go?
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- Re: Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Re: Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Re: Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Re: Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Re: SCL Dealing With Automatic Provides/Requires and Filtering
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Python- prefix must for all python module?
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-09-19 16:00 - 18:10 UTC)
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Dealing With Automatic Provides/Requires and Filtering
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: jquery bundling for new packages
- jquery bundling for new packages
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-19 16:00 UTC)
- Re: SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-12 16:00 UTC)
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-12 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Use of devtoolset in Koji builds for EPEL?
- Use of devtoolset in Koji builds for EPEL?
- SCL Notes and Questions
- Re: I'm curious about its release number
- Re: I'm curious about its release number
- I'm curious about its release number
- Re: Disabling auto update functionality
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Disabling auto update functionality
- Re: InitialCC for new packages?
- Re: InitialCC for new packages?
- Re: InitialCC for new packages?
- Re: InitialCC for new packages?
- InitialCC for new packages?
- Fedora Packaging guidelines for LibreOffice's extensions
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Re: Wiki How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25check_section
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-09-12 16:00 UTC)
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Re: Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Should .so files under python site dir be 755 perms?
- Re: Different source / binary package names
- Re: Different source / binary package names
- Re: Is this allowed? Files and libs duplicated in subpackages
- Re: Is this allowed? Files and libs duplicated in subpackages
- Re: Different source / binary package names
- Different source / binary package names
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite Forum]
[KDE Users]