Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/07/2014 01:51 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Bloom, the ROS generator system has recently gotten support to > > generate rpms[1]. At the moment, the author is simply putting > > releases into /opt/ros/$ros-release and isn't making use of SCLs. > > Is this OK, > > No, this is not OK > > > or > > should they use SCLs? > Neither. > > The package should integrate into the system directories. If it is a Fedora package, then it should integrate into the system directories. If it is a third-party package that doesn't follow Fedora's packaging standards, then this is what /opt is for. "ros" is registered as a provider name for the Open Source Robotics Foundation (http://www.lanana.org/lsbreg/providers/providers.txt), so if that's the ROS we're talking about, then /opt/ros is right. That doesn't answer the question about SCLs though. Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
