Using SCLs for ROS releases vs simply dumping them into /opt/ros/$ros-release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Bloom, the ROS generator system has recently gotten support to generate
rpms[1]. At the moment, the author is simply putting releases
into /opt/ros/$ros-release and isn't making use of SCLs. Is this OK, or
should they use SCLs? 

As you'll see from the ticket, I've already pointed him to SCLs, but
considering that he's already using /opt/ros/$ros-release, and not the
system directories, I'm wondering how using SCLs would be any different?

[1] https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/bloom/pull/228
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux