https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1010613#3 Ralf Corsepius 2013-09-22 06:49:29 EDT wrote: > > (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #2) > > The upstream name is "Concurrency Kit", so IMO the package should be named > > "concurrencykit" or "concurrency-kit". However, the tarball and git repo > > contain just "ck". > Is this meant to be a provocation, Michael? > > > The FPC needs to clarify the naming guidelines, as else > > it's not clear what "upstream name" they have in mind. > > From: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming > "When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball > or project name from which this software came." ... or _project name_ ... And the same page uses the term "upstream name" several times. Anyway, the FPC ticket suggesting clarification of the naming guidelines comments on that. > => Naming the package "ck" complies to this and you better stop wasting our time. Follow http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
