Re: SCL discussion at yesterday's meeting, easy stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/01/2013 09:18 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:43:51PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) said:
== Filesystem Location ==
A straw poll was taken about the filesystem location of SCLs.  A few FPC
members were willing to use /opt but others were heavily opposed to it.
Everyone was okay with using /usr/scl (or the plural form /usr/scls).  So
I think that needs to become the scl root dir (is that the right term?) for
Fedora.

[snip]


Ngggh. If the point is to have a stack that lives outside of the OS... then
it should *live outside of the OS*, not be grafted into a subpoint of the
OS. (IOW, I disagree.)

I suppose the counter example to the argument that because the directory is
under /usr it is grafted onto the OS would be /usr/local.  But I don't
know that any of the FPC members were looking at it in this light.

-Toshio



--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

I thought in this discussion was already mentioned: distribution musn't touch anything in /usr/local.

We need the installation inside the /opt directory because some users are using it exactly as Bill mentioned.

Marcela
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux