On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/01/2013 09:18 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:43:51PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:I thought in this discussion was already mentioned: distribution musn't touch anything in /usr/local.
Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) said:[snip]
== Filesystem Location ==
A straw poll was taken about the filesystem location of SCLs. A few FPC
members were willing to use /opt but others were heavily opposed to it.
Everyone was okay with using /usr/scl (or the plural form /usr/scls). So
I think that needs to become the scl root dir (is that the right term?) for
Fedora.
I suppose the counter example to the argument that because the directory is
Ngggh. If the point is to have a stack that lives outside of the OS... then
it should *live outside of the OS*, not be grafted into a subpoint of the
OS. (IOW, I disagree.)
under /usr it is grafted onto the OS would be /usr/local. But I don't
know that any of the FPC members were looking at it in this light.
-Toshio
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
We need the installation inside the /opt directory because some users are using it exactly as Bill mentioned.
Isn't that exactly why we musn't touch anything inside /opt?
-J
Marcela
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging