Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Marcela Mašláňová > <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > We need the installation inside the /opt directory because some > > users are using it exactly as Bill mentioned. > > > > Isn't that exactly why we musn't touch anything inside /opt? It seems reasonable to me that the Fedora project could be both an OS provider and an add-on provider. In its add-on provider role Fedora could register a provider name "fedora" with LANANA, and package SCLs for installation under /opt/fedora/<scl_name>. (I see that "rh", "rhat", "centos" and "suse" are already registered as provider names.) Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
