On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 01:29:52PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > On 11/01/2013 09:18 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:43:51PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >>Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) said: > >>>== Filesystem Location == > >>>A straw poll was taken about the filesystem location of SCLs. A few FPC > >>>members were willing to use /opt but others were heavily opposed to it. > >>>Everyone was okay with using /usr/scl (or the plural form /usr/scls). So > >>>I think that needs to become the scl root dir (is that the right term?) for > >>>Fedora. > >>> > >[snip] > >> > >> > >>Ngggh. If the point is to have a stack that lives outside of the OS... then > >>it should *live outside of the OS*, not be grafted into a subpoint of the > >>OS. (IOW, I disagree.) > >> > >I suppose the counter example to the argument that because the directory is > >under /usr it is grafted onto the OS would be /usr/local. But I don't > >know that any of the FPC members were looking at it in this light. > > > >-Toshio > > > I thought in this discussion was already mentioned: distribution > musn't touch anything in /usr/local. > <nod> I think you're trying to speak to a different point than I am making. I'm not saying that we should touch anything under /usr/local. I'm saying that /usr/local is precedent for subdirectories of /usr/ that "live outside of the OS". -Toshio
Attachment:
pgppahhOsk4BF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
