Matthew Miller (mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:58:02PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > >Not just unique in the name-collision aspect, but unique in that: > > > 1) it's going to be putting files in a different place than a normal rpm > > Why should user care about installation path? > > When the users are system administrators, it's part of their jobs to care. > > Same with the package names, really. The end-users/developers might not care > about either, but in that case, it also doesn't hurt to have a prefix. I would argue that SCL packages don't need a prefix in the package name in the same way that google-chrome doesn't (appear to) need a prefix to handle its installation in /opt. Bill -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
