On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:35:28AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > On 12/04/2013 11:51 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > as you probably know, the "Python 3 as a Default" [1] change has been > > > accepted by FESCo and is currently targeted for F22. > > > As a part of that Change, I also wrote that we should rethink some aspects > > > of Python packaging in Fedora. I have put together a proposal that > > > summarizes the current state and proposes a new approach to Python > > > packaging [2] > > > Before I propose it to FPC, I'd like to discuss it and work on it here on > > > lists and incorporate everybody's notes/suggestions. > > > So thanks for reading this through and sending your comments. > > > > You are missing that "Provides" in your examples. > > I didn't put them there intentionally, since I think it would be best if RPM created these automatically. > Put them in. These sorts of deps that will end up in manual deps and will be used by the user's to install packages should be explicit. deps that are both provided and required via autodeps only are okay to be implicit. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpq_foQbNMH1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
