Re: Should INSTALL file presented in RPM?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 1.10.2013 16:13, Paul Howarth napsal(a):
On 01/10/13 14:47, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 27.9.2013 07:08, Christopher Meng napsal(a):
Hi,

I plan to file tickets(bugs) to notify packagers of including INSTALL
files in RPMs. I think we don't have the needs to ship these files for
install instructions.

Any ideas? If all you agree I will start doing it now.

May be you can consider to add rpmlint warning? Just thinking loud ...

rpmlint has had the 'install-file-in-docs' warning for a long time:

"A file whose name suggests that it contains installation instructions
 is included in the package.  Such instructions are often not relevant
 for already installed packages; if this is the case for this file and
 it does not contain any information that is of interest after the
 package has been built and installed, do not include the file in the
 binary package."


Thanks, I did not know that. Then no action is needed ;)

Vít
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux