Dne 8.10.2013 14:22, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 10/08/2013 04:59 PM +9:00:
Dne 8.10.2013 09:36, Jan Kaluža napsal(a):
On 10/08/2013 07:18 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 7.10.2013 22:24, Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a):
* Instead we could build for the main Fedora Repo. If we do this,
the
spec
file, git repo name, and srpm package name all need to match.
That
means
we'd have a separate git-level package for each package+scl
combination.
So if we had scl-php5.6 and we needed a php and php-gettext
package
for it
we'd need separate git-level packages named scl-php5.6-php and
scl-php5.6-php-gettext.
This goes exactly against the basic premise on which SCL were build
and
that is: "The SCL package must be buildable from the very same .spec
file into regular package as well as SCL package.".
I'm not following SCL in Fedora, but even the first way suggested by
Toshio is against this basic premise. When you have another .spec
file in extra branch, it's not the "very same .spec file"
Different branch does not mean the files are different. It is just
different branch. You can merge, cherry-pick, etc.
Note that this is completely against what you said before:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-March/008936.html
I remember that and that still holds. SCL is not my design, though.
Vít
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
