On 01/19/2014 07:09 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Matthias Runge > <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello everybody, >> >> could you please tell me, what's the status with JavaScript (client side >> libraries) and Web Assets? >> >> There are quite a few packages bundling e.g. jQuery. we have a review >> request for jQuery itself[1] >> >> So, the Web_Assets guideline[2] and JavaScript guideline[3] isn't really >> in production, because it can not be applied to current packages and >> even not applied to packages under review, or am I wrong here? >> >> jQuery comes with several versions, esp. earlier versions are not >> compatible with later ones. We couldn't expect to be able to make every >> package compatible with jQuery's latest version. How shall this be handled? > > The plan for jQuery is now outlined at: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/jQuery > > I plan to introduce two jquery packages: > js-jquery - jquery 2.x latest - for webapps that use jquery2/don't > care about IE6 > js-jquery1 - jquery 1.x latest - for webapps that do care about IE6 Thank you for clarification; it absolutely makes sense to me, from a packager perspective, we don't need to argue about bundling etc :D With my OpenStack Horizon hat on, I see a huge piece of work coming to me. Many of the JavaScript guys I talked to in the past don't care about that, or try to argue, why bundling is necessary. Sigh. Matthias -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
