Quoting pavel@xxxxxxxxxxx:
Quoting Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:14:42 +0100, pavel@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi packagers,
If you have package with separate -doc subpackage and the subpackage
contains files
from %{buildroot} (compiled documentation or so on) you're probably
interesting in.
For some reasons (I *think* it is a regression after last switching to
unversioned docs)
rpm packages doc directory twice without any reasons (and does it even
if main package doesn't contain any references to
%doc or %{_docdir} at all!)
See: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338
Thank you for the link. from the case:
With the unversioned docdir in Fedora 20, the %doc line will
include the full %{_docdir}/%{name} tree in the base package,
regardless of which local doc files are specified in that line.
BUT:
SPEC:
%files
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}/relocatable
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}*.so.%{version}
%{_libdir}/%{name}/relocatable/lib%{name}*.so.%{version}
and result:
rpm -qpl RPMS/x86_64/aws-3.1.0-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm | grep share/doc | wc -l
94
Ah no. Please forget my last comment. Wrong build number.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
