Le 08/11/2013 08:33, Bohuslav Kabrda a écrit : >> When scl-utils vendor is not the package vendor this inconsitency create >> an issue. > > That is solved by redefining _scl_prefix in your own metapackage. I really don't see the problem. This is exactly the problem = > you don't see the problem. You cannot redefine _scl_prefix in each package. - this will be redundant and tricky - you don't know which is the correct directory (owned by foo-runtime) Definitively, I think I must forgive the idea of extending RHSCL in EPEL. If RHSCL users want to extends existing SCL, they will have to rely on themselves or Red Hat? Remi. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
