Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> Le 08/11/2013 08:05, Bohuslav Kabrda a écrit :
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> %_root_prefix = /opt/rh/foo/root
> >> directory own by foo-untime
> >> macro defined by scl-utils (as %_scl_prefix/%sclname/root)
> >>
> > 
> > %_datadir = /usr/share
> > directory owned by filesystem
> > macro defined by rpm
> > 
> > Is this inconsistent too?
> 
> You cannot compare.
> 

Sure I can. The relationship filesystem<->rpm is the same as foo-runtime<->scl-utils

> SCL are very different because of vendor.
> 
> When scl-utils vendor is not the package vendor this inconsitency create
> an issue.

That is solved by redefining _scl_prefix in your own metapackage. I really don't see the problem.

> Remi.
> 
> > 
> >> This is obviously not consistent
> >>
> >> Remi.
> > 

-- 
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux