Re: Future of gridgengine package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20 February 2014 23:48, Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
> If I keep the gridengine name I'll need to add an epoch (version 2011.11p1
> ---> 8.1.6).
>
> If I move to sge, I assume I can:
>
> Obsolete: gridengine <= 2011.11p1-16
> Provides: gridengine = 2011.11p1-17 ?
>
> Suggestions?  Just needing some motivation and moral support really to pull
> the trigger.

Naming the package sge would definitely be the right thing to do,
despite upstream's  RPM naming IMO.

You're a braver man than I. :)

Jonathan.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux