On Oct 7, 2013 11:31 PM, "Bohuslav Kabrda" <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > There's two models that we can choose from:
> >
> > * Building to separate targets per scl. For that model you can have
> > a separate branch per scl. This is more or less the style that's being
> > used inside of RH. However, in Fedora land this would mean that we need
> > to have seperate yum repos per scl, seperate bodhi updates targets, and
> > some
> > way to add repo files to systems for each scl.
>
> Why would it mean all that? Could you please provide an explanation - is it because lack of support in tooling or something else?
>
Yes, according to dgilmore the tools do not support the use case of building packages that do not have a match between spec file name, git repo name, srpm name if the object is to deploy to the main fedora repo.
As noted below he did say he'd like to test to see if there is a way to enable that behavior but he couldn't think of a way that would work without some hands on testing.
If you have some light to shed on that please contact him (and cc or summarize for this list.)
-Toshio
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
