----- Original Message -----
> What about package that doesn't have python- prefix?
>
> I saw that in the example:
>
> %if 0%{?with_python2}
> ...
> BuildRequires: tkinter
> %endif
>
> %if 0%{?with_python3}
> ...
> BuildRequires: python3-tkinter
> %endif
>
> So I guess tkinter is Python 2. Should it be renamed to python2-tkinter
> and provide tkinter? Or should Python 3 version provide tkinter? Or both?
(tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself) Renaming tkinter to python2-tkinter (with proper Provides and Obsoletes) would be the way to go here, I think. I'll fix it in the proposal.
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
