Re: scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 08/11/2013 08:58, Bohuslav Kabrda a écrit :

> Extending as in "building more packages into the same collection"? You shouldn't be able to do that, that is by desing of RHSCL afaik.

Yes, this is my first thought.

Toshio, can you please update the Guildelines draft about this ?

"All SCL packages MUST be part of en existing collection in Fedora/EPEL
(cannot extend a collection from another vendor, such as RHSCL or RHDTS)"



Remi.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux