On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:37:21AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > A prefix is necessary to make the scl packages unique from non-scl packages. > > > > I did mention that the downstream naming was wrong and would need to be > > changed a long time ago. > > I could find places where you mentioned that it was wrong, but I didn't find any reasoning. Could you please state why you think the downstream naming is wrong? > Just replied to mmaslano -- I believe I've only mentioned it onlist because I discussed it with mmaslano on IRC and with langdon in #scl on freenode when doing the initial review of the draft. Apologies for that, I assumed from mmaslano's comments that there was an scl team that was actively discussing a prefix (using a vendor) and that she would carry back the rationale as to why no prefix wouldn't work. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp9PWBU4Tx8E.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
