Re: Packages approved without satisfied dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 12:54, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I see more often then I would like that some packages get pushed
> into Fedora and immediately appears among broken dependencies, since
> they were pushed into Fedora sooner then their dependencies.
> 
> So I propose to add one additional bullet into reviewer guidelines [1]:
> 
> "Package has to have satisfied all its dependencies prior it is approved."
> 
> Hopefully somebody will notice next time during review ....

*Sigh* it's another case of something so obvious that nobody thought
it needed to be spelled out before, but apparently it's necessary now,
so +1.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux