On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:12:42PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Unfortunately, FHS is dead upstream. Linux Foundation made an attempt at > resuscitation about two years ago, but that immediately stalled again. > > I filed this <https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1164> after > talking to Jeff Licquia at LinuxCon, but it hasn't gotten any response. > If we feel that FHS continues to be important, maybe we need to get involved > in that upstream. > <nod> -- Is there an FHS group to get involved with or does it need to be a reboot? Grab a few Debian, Ubuntu, Arch, gentoo, FSF, etc people to look at what shortcomings we find in the current FHS draft and work on having those addressed one at a time? -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpOm5ta0frlE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
