Re: Missing library symbolic links

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:13:24 -0800 (PST), David Highley wrote:

> "Ralf Corsepius wrote:"
> > 
> > On 11/07/2013 04:36 AM, David Highley wrote:
> > > We have noticed a growing trend of the final symbolic link not being
> > > established for libraries.
> > Could you provide an example?
> > 
> > To me, your description sounds like as if you have encountered packaging 
> > bugs in some packages.
> 
> Then there are several; X11, libxml2, libxslt, and others. Its not a
> simple script to try and identify all the ones missing as there are no
> hard and fast naming rules for libraries so that you could easily parse
> the real library and then check for symlink.

Sounds a bit as if you're missing the *-devel packages for those libs.
libX11-devel libxml2-devel and so on.
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux