On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 01:36:53PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda <bkabrda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Dne 4.12.2013 12:37, Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): > >> > (tkinter is actually a subpackage of python itself) > >> > >> I guess you know what I mean here, but to be clear: > >> > >> tkinter is only an example, we got more, like pyserial, PyYAML... > > > > Oh, I see. Some time ago, FPC has accepted a change that says, that packages with "py" in name should be prefixed with "python-" anyway [1]. Since this only applies to newly created packages, we will have to cope with this, unfortunately. So my idea of handling this would be: > > - all packages must have Provides: python-* > > - packages that weren't prefixed with "python-" previously (pyserial, PyYAML), should also carry an explicit Provides/Obsoletes for the old name. > > Sounds good? > > What about packages named without the python- prefix for consistency [1] > with other distros ? > > Which rule should prevail ? > > Dridi > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming > The python- naming guidelines take precedence as they are more specific to the situation than the general naming guideline. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgppVTbHTuGkh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
