Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: James Antill
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Horst H. von Brand
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Horst H. von Brand
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: James Antill
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: drago01
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Jeffrey Ollie
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Want to get your hands dirty with hacking on fedpkg?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Chris Adams
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: drago01
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Chris Adams
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: James Antill
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: John Reiser
Re: cmake guideline updates
From
: Rex Dieter
Upcoming Bugzilla Changes: Rawhide Rebase
From
: Jeff Raber
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: cmake guideline updates
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: drago01
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: James Antill
Re: recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Colin Walters
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Colin Walters
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Tomasz Torcz
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
rawhide report: 20100714 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Orphaning engine_pkcs11, Passing libp11 to Kalev Lember
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Tomasz Torcz
Package Review Stats for last week ending 11th July
From
: Rakesh Pandit
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Peter Gordon
[HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps
From
: Lennart Poettering
Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Meeting logs enhancement
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Luke Macken
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Minutes/Summary for today's FESCo meeting (2010-07-13)
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Pádraig Brady
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Adam Williamson
gdb index feature
From
: Tom Tromey
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Till Maas
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release
From
: Luke Macken
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Luke Macken
Re: measuring success
From
: Luke Macken
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: Meeting logs enhancement
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Meeting logs enhancement
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Meeting logs enhancement
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: REMINDER: Test machine resources for package maintainers
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Karel Klic
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Karel Klic
Re: REMINDER: Test machine resources for package maintainers
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: REMINDER: Test machine resources for package maintainers
From
: Till Maas
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: drago01
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Chris Adams
Re: REMINDER: Test machine resources for package maintainers
From
: Till Maas
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Frank Ch. Eigler
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Carl Gaudreault
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Jakub Jelinek
KDE-SIG meeting report (28/2010)
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Brian C. Lane
Re: concept of package "ownership"
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Brandon Lozza
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Pádraig Brady
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: Distributions & updates
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Tomasz Torcz
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Distributions & updates
From
: Till Maas
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Matěj Cepl
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Till Maas
Re: Distributions & updates
From
: Peter Jones
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Manuel Wolfshant
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: James Antill
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Pekka Pietikainen
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Review trade needed
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Jon Ciesla
Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.
From
: Daniel J Walsh
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
rawhide report: 20100713 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: David Shaw
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Fabio M. Di Nitto
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Léon Keijser
Re: dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Laurent Rineau
Re: recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Andrew Haley
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: package review checklist
From
: Pierre-Yves
Re: concept of package "ownership"
From
: Patrice Dumas
Re: package review checklist
From
: Manuel Wolfshant
Orphaning zikula module packages originally made for Fedora Insight
From
: Mel Chua
Re: package review checklist
From
: Jens Petersen
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Andrew Haley
Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?
From
: Karel Klic
Re: Building under mock (rawhide)
From
: seth vidal
dist-git testers wanted!
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Building under mock (rawhide)
From
: Ben Boeckel
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: wordpress needs a new (co-)maintainer
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Fedora 14 Feature Submission deadline is tomorrow (2010-07-13)
From
: John Poelstra
REMINDER: Test machine resources for package maintainers
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Building under mock (rawhide)
From
: seth vidal
Re: Building under mock (rawhide)
From
: Clark Williams
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Björn Persson
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Björn Persson
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Fedora 14 Schedule Reminder
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-07-13)
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Eric Sandeen
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jan Vcelak
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: John5342
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jiri Popelka
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: wordpress needs a new (co-)maintainer
From
: Jon Ciesla
wordpress needs a new (co-)maintainer
From
: Adrian Reber
rawhide report: 20100712 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Sebastian Dziallas
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Michel Alexandre Salim
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Sergio Pascual
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: drago01
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Michal Nowak
'man' in comps?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: drago01
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Mathieu Bridon
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Michel Alexandre Salim
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Michel Alexandre Salim
Re: orphaning a few packages
From
: Michel Alexandre Salim
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: Michel Alexandre Salim
denemo-0.8.18-1.fc14 License change GPLV2 to GPLV3+
From
: Roy Rankin
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: orphaning dblatex
From
: Neal Becker
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Camilo Mesias
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: orphaning dblatex
From
: Alex Lancaster
recoll review request help : using modified versions of libraries for build
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Carl G.
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Felix Miata
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: package review checklist
From
: Christopher Brown
Heads up - mono 2.6.7 on it's way
From
: Paul
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Carl Gaudreault
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Eric "Sparks" Christensen
Re: python-webpy slightly outdated [REMIND]
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Booting from SCSI CDROM
From
: Emilio Fernandes
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: merge reviews
From
: drago01
Re: package review checklist
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: package review checklist
From
: Garrett Holmstrom
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: philippe makowski
Re: merge reviews
From
: Kevin Kofler
orphaning dblatex
From
: Neal Becker
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: drago01
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Roberto Ragusa
[Zope-SIG] Grok is available in the Zope SIG repo.
From
: Robin 'cheese' Lee
Re: merge reviews
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Carl Gaudreault
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Matt McCutchen
python-webpy slightly outdated [REMIND]
From
: Athmane Madjoudj
Re: merge reviews
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: (lack of) maintainership of epiphany?
From
: Andreas Tunek
Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
From
: Andreas Tunek
Re: New QGIS owner
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: package review checklist
From
: Kevin Fenzi
New QGIS owner
From
: Volker Fröhlich
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: package review checklist
From
: Till Maas
package review checklist
From
: Ian Weller
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: seth vidal
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Al Dunsmuir
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Al Dunsmuir
Re: merge reviews
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: merge reviews
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Distributions & updates
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Thomas Woerner
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: seth vidal
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Python 2.7 status: mass rebuild of python packages requested
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Python 2.7 status: mass rebuild of python packages requested
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: merge reviews
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
Distributions & updates
From
: Fred Walker
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Review swap: 612384, 612076
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: rebuild of wxGTK without the internal crash handler in Rawhide
From
: Dan Horák
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Michal Hlavinka
rawhide report: 20100709 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Mattias Ellert
Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
From
: Chen Lei
Review swap: 612384, 612076
From
: Shakthi Kannan
Re: merge reviews
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: merge reviews
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Ulrich Drepper
Re: merge reviews
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Outage: Koji upgrade/migration - 2010-07-09 22:00 UTC
From
: Dennis Gilmore
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: Python 2.7 status: mass rebuild of python packages requested
From
: seth vidal
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: seth vidal
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: merge reviews
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: merge reviews
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Ulrich Drepper
Re: merge reviews
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Python 2.7 status: mass rebuild of python packages requested
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: merge reviews
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: merge reviews
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Brandon Lozza
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Adam Williamson
Python 2.7 status: mass rebuild of python packages requested
From
: David Malcolm
Re: merge reviews
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: merge reviews
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: merge reviews
From
: Jussi Lehtola
orphaning gg2
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Paul
Re: merge reviews
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: merge reviews
From
: Thomas Spura
Re: merge reviews
From
: Till Maas
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Rob Crittenden
merge reviews
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Kalev Lember
Re: orphaning a few packages
From
: Tom Atkinson
Re: Outage: PHX2 outage - 2010-07-05 01:00 UTC
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Hey Presto!
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Take over of libart_lgpl
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: Hey Presto!
From
: Jonathan Dieter
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Remi Collet
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Chen Lei
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: please discuss: sane naming of critical path comps groups
From
: Till Maas
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: Hey Presto!
From
: Michael Schroeder
Re: please discuss: sane naming of critical path comps groups
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Brandon Lozza
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Ankur Sinha
please discuss: sane naming of critical path comps groups
From
: Till Maas
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Karel Klic
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Omair Majid
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jan Kaluza
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Petr Lautrbach
rawhide report: 20100708 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Petr Sabata
Re: Recoll package
From
: Jean-Francois Dockes
Re: Recoll package
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jan Safranek
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jaroslav Skarvada
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Michal Schmidt
Re: Recoll package
From
: Jean-Francois Dockes
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Dan Horák
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: Recoll package
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Recoll package
From
: Marcela Mašláňová
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Shakthi Kannan
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Michael Schwendt
Recoll package
From
: Jean-Francois Dockes
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Marcela Mašláňová
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Thomas Sailer
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Rahul Sundaram
gcc-4.5-RH in F14
From
: Jakub Jelinek
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Till Maas
Re: Review trade request, pkg "hail" (BZ#611033) for something else?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jarod Wilson
Re: Review trade request, pkg "hail" (BZ#611033) for something else?
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Review trade request, pkg "hail" (BZ#611033) for something else?
From
: Jeff Garzik
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Juan Rodriguez
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: seth vidal
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Jeffrey Fearn
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Michel Alexandre Salim
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Ville-Pekka Vainio
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Thomas Spura
Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
From
: Tom "spot" Callaway
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: James Laska
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Will Woods
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: John Poelstra
Request to take over libart_lgpl
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: HEADS UP - packages requiring openldap or openldap-clients
From
: Rich Megginson
Re: HEADS UP - packages requiring openldap or openldap-clients
From
: Tom Lane
HEADS UP - packages requiring openldap or openldap-clients
From
: Jan Vcelak
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile
From
: Michal Hlavinka
Re: JOGL/Gluegen
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: James Laska
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
rawhide report: 20100707 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Thomas Spura
Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?
From
: Marcela Mašláňová
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: (lack of) maintainership of epiphany?
From
: Andreas Tunek
Re: webkitgtk abi bump
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: Deactivating LVDS display when laptop lid is closed
From
: Dan Horák
Re: Help with Koji error: "error: possibly undefined macro: AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FDdnl"
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Re: Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Fedora 14 test release blocker bugs
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Chris Jones
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: concept of package "ownership"
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: concept of package "ownership"
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: (lack of) maintainership of epiphany?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Requires --> BuildRequires (was: Re: measuring success)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Deactivating LVDS display when laptop lid is closed
From
: Orion Poplawski
Re: measuring success [was Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release]
From
: Kevin Kofler
Minutes/Summary from today's FESCo meeting (2010-07-06 at 19:30UTC)
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?
From
: seth vidal
Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?
From
: Chitlesh GOORAH
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Till Maas
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Till Maas
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Till Maas
[Test-Announce] Please help test 389 Directory Server 1.2.6 Release Candidate 3
From
: Rich Megginson
Re: Help with Koji error: "error: possibly undefined macro: AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FDdnl"
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Will Woods
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Thomas Janssen
Help with Koji error: "error: possibly undefined macro: AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FDdnl"
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Fedora 14 Feature Submission Deadline is One Week Away (2010-07-13)
From
: John Poelstra
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Till Maas
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Till Maas
Outage: PHX2 outage - 2010-07-05 01:00 UTC
From
: Mike McGrath
take over of gnustep-make
From
: Jochen Schmitt
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: concept of package "ownership"
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-07-06 at 19:30UTC)
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Bodhi 0.7.5 release
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Till Maas
Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-07-06 at 19:30UTC)
From
: Till Maas
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Till Maas
depcheck test (was Re: measuring success)
From
: Will Woods
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Till Maas
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Orcan Ogetbil
Re: rpms/shared-mime-info/devel shared-mime-info.spec,1.84,1.85
From
: Colin Walters
Re: rpms/shared-mime-info/devel shared-mime-info.spec,1.84,1.85
From
: Mamoru Tasaka
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: rpms/shared-mime-info/devel shared-mime-info.spec,1.84,1.85
From
: Colin Walters
Fedora 14 Schedule Reminder
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-07-06 at 19:30UTC)
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Patrice Dumas
(lack of) maintainership of epiphany?
From
: pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx
rawhide report: 20100706 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: concept of package "ownership"
From
: Darryl L. Pierce
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Thomas Spura
Re: CVS connection time-outs
From
: Manuel Wolfshant
Re: CVS connection time-outs
From
: Patrick MONNERAT
Re: CVS connection time-outs
From
: Andreas Schwab
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Can anyone contact Gérard Milmeister (gemi)?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: CVS connection time-outs
From
: Patrick MONNERAT
Re: Non responsive maintainer: cheese ?
From
: Pierre-Yves
Re: Make pkgdb grant co-maintainer status automatically? (was Re: Non-responsive maintainer fast track procedure for libsndfile)
From
: Alexander Kurtakov
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
