Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> There is actually a benefit to having the subpackage name be part of the
> license location, in situations where the independent subpackage name
> significantly differs from the basename of the source package, it is
> easier for someone not versed in RPM to locate the applicable license
> texts while traversing /usr/share/doc/ .

Another way would be to have symbolic links named after the subpackages, 
pointing to the directory named after the source package.

Björn Persson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux