On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:29:01 -0400, Tom wrote:
> However, if a subpackage is independent of any base package (it does
> not require it, either implicitly or explicitly), it must include
> copies of any license texts (as present in the source) which are
> applicable to the files contained within the subpackage.
With this we've reached the point once more where the default %doc dir is
a poor choice, because it is based on the subpackage's %{name} instead of
the src.rpm's or base package's %{name}.
For the common tools'n'library split of a package, the changed guidelines
duplicate the license files by storing them in two different directories
when using %doc:
/usr/share/doc/name-1.0/COPYING
/usr/share/doc/name-libs-1.0/COPYING
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
