On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:56:41 +0200,
Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I think this is another problem with pkgdb or Fedora. Why is there a
> > maintainer ("owner"?) and co-maintainers, rather than just having all
> > co-maintainers be equal?
>
> Good point. I think, just like you, that there should be a list of owners
> rather than just 1 owner.
I think anyone who can update ACLs should be effectively considered an
owner.
> > If #maintainers == 0 then the package is either just sitting there (as
> > long as there are no serious bugs), or is being best-effort maintained
> > by provenpackagers, at least until that becomes a burden and only then
> > should the package be dropped.
>
> This is really a separate issue, but FWIW, I agree with you on this point as
> well.
It's also possible now to have a package with no owner, but co-maintainers.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
