Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think this is another problem with pkgdb or Fedora. Why is there a
> maintainer ("owner"?) and co-maintainers, rather than just having all
> co-maintainers be equal?
Good point. I think, just like you, that there should be a list of owners
rather than just 1 owner.
> As people know, my default position is for inclusion: we should try to
> include as many packages in Fedora that we can, except where there is
> a legal or insuperable technical problem with that.
>
> So I think it's valid for packages to have 0, 1, 2, or more
> maintainers.
>
> If #maintainers == 0 then the package is either just sitting there (as
> long as there are no serious bugs), or is being best-effort maintained
> by provenpackagers, at least until that becomes a burden and only then
> should the package be dropped.
This is really a separate issue, but FWIW, I agree with you on this point as
well.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
