On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:26 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 14.07.10 13:16, Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 22:09 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > > 6. plymouth interactions > > > > > > There's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614245 which > > > currently is an issue when using plymouth in conjunction with > > > systemd. Ray promised to look into this every day now ;-) > > > > Plymouth is the default, so if you make systemd the default, almost > > everyone is going to be using plymouth in conjunction with systemd. If > > that's currently broken, I don't really think it makes sense to flip the > > switch on systemd. > > Well, it's not as broken that your system won't boot up. All that > happens is that you will get a text bootup instead of a graphical > one. Not a big deal. But yes, this should be fixed. And it is probably > even very easy to fix it. But nothing that should stop us from flipping > the switch now. Ah, OK, that seems alright then. Did you see the post a while back from someone who tried systemd and found it wouldn't boot their system? Just curious. I will try this myself later today. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
