On 7/9/2010 12:32, Ian Weller wrote: > I got to thinking (uh oh) after reading a few threads on devel about > there being far too many review requests and not enough packagers > interested in reviews. I know that one thing that makes package reviews > bearable for me is a checklist to go through. I use this one: > http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/review.txt > It's a derivative of somebody else's. I forgot whose. And it hasn't been > updated since I last touched it, so there are some things that can fall > through this checklist that are recent guidelines. > > I know a lot of others also have their own checklists, but I don't know > if it's regularly updated. > > Should someone write up a draft for an official package review > checklist, and have FPC update it when guidelines change? (I guess by > writing this email I just volunteered myself...) That would be a great idea as long as it is kept up to date. (In fact, I'm fairly certain work has already been done toward making one.) The one I have been using is fairly comprehensive; maybe it can help build one: http://www.physics.umn.edu/~holms/review-template.txt -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
