Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/08/2010 04:39 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Can you please clarify this one? The sub packages depend on the -common,
> which has the LICENSE etc. docs. Is this because the main package
> doesn't Requires: -common?

Caveat: I have not looked at your specific spec, so I am hypothesizing here.

Lets say that your beteckna-fonts SRPM generates these binary RPMS:

- beteckna-fonts
- beteckna-fonts-common
- beteckna-fonts-shiny

If both "beteckna-fonts" and "beteckna-fonts-shiny" depend (either
implicitly or explicitly) on "beteckna-fonts-common", and
"beteckna-fonts-common" has the license texts in it, you do not need to
do anything.

If "beteckna-fonts" (or "beteckna-fonts-shiny") does not depend (either
implicitly or explicitly) on "beteckna-fonts-common", then you will need
to add copies of the license text to that package.

~spot
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux